5 comments

  • sriniwasx 1 hour ago
    As cool as it sound, do we actually need it? also what problem are we solving?

    Performance is probably the only angle that has some potential but only short requests, the db and other external IO/services is a bigger bottleneck.

    • rfgplk 6 minutes ago
      Because the performance of existing web frameworks is... _absymal_. They are nowhere close to how fast they can be. And I don't mean slower by a bit, I mean close to a factor of 10x. My in-house framework can serve 600-700k requests/s on a single core, while beast (the best c++ framework i could identify) does 250k at best. nginx/apache and other prebaked servers are even slower, at 100k req/s. Tells you all you need to know.
  • Panzerschrek 3 hours ago
    It looks suspicious. It has only 18 commits, the majority of code was added via single initial commit. is it LLM-generated?
    • NewsaHackO 1 hour ago
      If I were to open source a project these days, I will definitely have my progress be a clean, huge initial single commit. Too many busybodies trying to piece together code forensics to say something is vibe coded or not.
      • gruntled-worker 1 hour ago
        If new free projects had to have a "100% artisanal" pledge I wouldn't even consider starting one. Hand-crafting the core design is still superior. Not delegating the grunt work for copy-paste level stuff is just wasting time, though. I don't require the circuit boards in my electronics to be hand-drilled either.
    • localhoster 2 hours ago
      Read through the readme a bit, it's obv it is
    • gjvc 2 hours ago
      sounds like you are envious of their productivity. define "suspicious"
  • hilti 2 hours ago
    I like the idea and the logo. But some real world examples like database usage, partials within templates and handling forms are missing.
  • winrid 3 hours ago
    You need examples for actually using different databases.
  • standar-donkey 4 hours ago
    [flagged]