Chrome again exempts Google from user site data settings

(lapcatsoftware.com)

177 points | by ExMachina73 4 hours ago

7 comments

  • fedpost 2 hours ago
    It's okay, they're not a monopoly according to this administration. Nothing to see here, carry on!
    • pavon 48 minutes ago
      This administration has done nothing to end or undermine the antitrust cases against Google. In both cases the judges found Google in violation of antitrust law, but both handed down fairly mild remedies, despite the administration (prosecutor) pushing for much stronger changes. The judges were appointed by Clinton (Leonie Brinkema) and Obama (Amit Mehta).
    • Mountain_Skies 1 hour ago
      Google and the rest of the billionaire class thank you for ensuring everyone is too divided by red/blue tribalism to ever have enough unity to mount a fight against them. Well done!
      • asdf88990 1 hour ago
        Exactly. It is like Google has only emerged during this administration with their shenanigans.
        • 8note 1 hour ago
          iirc lina khan was appointed during the first trump admin and got most of her work done suing to split google during the biden admin?

          you are a bit out of the loop if you think this is a partisan issue, or specifically one thats only there when trump is in charge

          • thephyber 14 minutes ago
            Using Lina Khan as an example (your only example?) undermines your point because she started upset Biden and was quickly fired after Trump 2 started.
          • c0balt 51 minutes ago
            She got nominated by Biden in Biden's last term in March of 2021 and left in 2025 two weeks after Trump assumed office.

            She did not get appointed under Trump nor did substantial work done under his administration.

            Edit: I do not necessarily disagree with your comment on the partisan aspects of this issue. This is only meant to respond to the first paragraph.

  • mgiampapa 1 hour ago
    I feel like the obvious thing to check here is that all chrome processes have terminated between tests. If it's still running some zombie process of course the data would persist.
    • stkdump 0 minutes ago
      It would still be a (albeit convenient for google) bug, as the setting indicates closing all windows as the trigger for deletion.
    • frankacter 1 hour ago
      At least on windows, closing chrome doesn't close the system tray process which keeps Chrome and Gemini prestaged and cached. Wonder if OP is experiencing a version of that on his Mac?
      • Tempest1981 1 hour ago
        Microsoft Edge does this too, iirc, for "Startup Boost".
  • flyingshelf 1 hour ago
    When you log into Google, you also log into Chrome. This means that you'll have a lot of exceptions for Google websites or else a "clear history" would log you out of Chrome.

    Not justifying it (I don't use chrome) but that's likely what's happening here.

    • ande-mnoc 49 minutes ago
      This is what the “Allow Chrome sign-in” setting is for and is turned off by the post author.
    • demibabs 52 minutes ago
      In the article he explains he’s not signed into Chrome nor Google during the experiment.
  • tjpnz 4 minutes ago
    Google needs to be broken up.
  • righthand 11 minutes ago
    Google/Alphabet is a bunch of useful good intentioned services wrapped around an nonuseful evil analytics core/monopoly. The people who work with good intentions that “just want to build cool things”, protect the monopoly and the people with bad intentions, who work to empower Google’s monopoly.
  • cute_boi 38 minutes ago
    > all Google Search results are now opaque https://www.google.com/goto?url= garbage rather than the site URLs!

    Can google justify why are they doing this? I wish google will die sooner if they start behaving like this.

  • thinker34 1 hour ago
    >> I’m personally inclined to cite Hanlon’s razor here rather than engage in conspiracy theories.

    That is a likely case. Chrome is their closed source software unlike the Chromium browser.

    • LastTrain 1 hour ago
      Hanlon’s Razor applies to human behavior, not corporations.
      • tehlike 1 hour ago
        Engineers are humans.
        • edoceo 56 minutes ago
          Corporations are not, they're made of humans but they behave worse than an individual.
          • isncjwjxjwnd 12 minutes ago
            And who do you think makes these behavioural decisions? There is no “corporation”, there are, however, those currently on that company’s payroll.

            It’s their fault. The people. The humans. The ones working there. The ones knowingly employing their knowledge in service of the company.

            It’s always the humans.

        • cute_boi 28 minutes ago
          Politicians are also humans, everyone working for De Beers are also human... Please stop justifying egregious behavior from company who is destroying the fabric of internet with too many useless ads....And it isn't first time they are doing it, these "engineers" were the one who removed mv2 without better ad blocks in mv3.
          • tehlike 0 minutes ago
            1. ads are not useless. 2. without ads, there would be significantly less free content for people to read.

            It's hip to say ads make things worse, but reality is often much more nuanced.

          • charcircuit 4 minutes ago
            >useless ads

            If the ads were useless, advertisers would not pay for them to exist.

            >without better ad blocks in mv3

            MV3 adblockers were built before MV2 was deprecated.